Is America Worth Preserving?
If you missed Laura Ingraham’s Fox News show last night, you need to watch it online. It was one of the most powerful “Ingraham Angles” she has ever done. It was a master class in how conservative candidates ought to talk when they’re being interviewed or speaking to voters.
She focused on yesterday’s congressional testimony by California resident Marcus Coleman and Patricia Fox of Colorado. They described the catastrophic, life-changing injuries their daughters suffered in vehicle accidents caused by illegal aliens who were in the country because of the Left’s open borders.
Fox blasted congressional Democrats, saying, “Our stories shouldn’t be partisan. The lives of American citizens should matter to both sides. We get it—you guys hate Trump. . . You need to love Americans more than you hate Trump!”
Coleman also excoriated the open-border Democrats. “I reject your guys’ sympathy, to be honest with you,” Coleman said. “Not one of you guys has ever called me . . . [or] reached out to me. . . My daughter doesn’t deserve this. . . I hold each and every one of you responsible for it, and I always will.”
The pain and anguish of that Colorado mother and California father should have been a top story on every evening news broadcast. But, as Laura Ingraham noted, Democrats are desperate to bury their stories. Their families are just collateral damage in the Left’s jihad to “fundamentally transform America” through open borders and mass migration.
At the end of her opening monologue, Ingraham brilliantly summed up what this election is all about. She said:
“This campaign for the midterms and 2028 should focus on one simple question: Do you believe that America is really worth preserving—our borders, our jobs, our traditions? If so, your vote should hinge on which party and which candidate has a better track record of defending them. It’s an easy answer.”
My friends, as you will read below, we are in a very real battle to save our country, and the outcome is far from certain. If you believe America is worth preserving, help me defeat the Marxist open borders Left. Please stand with me now!
Democrats Defend Socialism
Most Democrat candidates and elected officials are desperate to convince swing voters that they’re really not radical socialists. They’re lying. House Democrats just had a chance to prove their commitment to free markets and the Constitution, and they failed.
Yesterday evening, Speaker Mike Johnson put a resolution on the House floor condemning socialism. While every Republican voted for it, 192 House Democrats, including Democrat Leader Hakeem Jeffries, voted against it.
Only 8 Democrats—just 4% of the House Democrat caucus—voted to condemn socialism. Let that sink in. And remember this vote the next time you hear a Democrat politician say, “Oh, I’m not one of those crazy socialists.”
By the way, 7 of those 8 Democrats are in tossup districts. They probably would have voted with the rest of their caucus, but they knew it could cost them the election. They are:
- Kathy Castor (FL-14)
- Henry Cuellar (TX-28)
- Donald Davis (NC-1)
- Vicente Gonzalez (TX-34)
- Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (WA-3)
- Darren Soto (FL-9)
- Gabe Vasquez (NM-2)
Of course, everyone needs to vote. (Click here now if you’re not registered to vote.) But if you live in one of these districts, you MUST vote. Your “representative” is in a party that is comfortable with socialism, mutilating children, open borders and the totalitarian tendencies of the Left. They only voted “no” to fool you.
Talarico Goes Full Communist
James Talarico, the great Blue hope of Texas, is another Democrat doing his best to fool voters. But his moderate makeover keeps crashing into his own radical rhetoric. He told a group of environmentalist wackos that there is a “link between climate change and White supremacy and capitalism.”
And what exactly does he want to do about it? Channeling his inner communist, “Talafreako” explained, “Only [by] ending the ways that all three of those oppressive systems work together are we gonna be able to begin the process of dismantling them.”
So, “Talafreako” wants to “dismantle” capitalism, which he considers an “oppressive system” just as evil as racism. This Presbyterian seminarian is clearly an expert on the “Gospel of Karl Marx,” which isn’t surprising given his communist affiliations. (See next item.)
Danger In Dallas
The radical far-left group Indivisible Dallas has hosted campaign events for James Talarico this year. It is also part of a coalition that is planning to march on the GOP midterm convention next week in Dallas, Texas.
That coalition includes the Dallas chapters of the Communist Party USA and the Freedom Road Socialist Organization (FRSO). For those unfamiliar with FRSO, the group defines itself as an “organization of revolutionaries fighting for socialism in the United States. . . building towards the creation of a new Communist Party based on Marxism-Leninism.”
There is a real chance of violence at the GOP convention. Left-wing groups would love to create a scene of chaos and violence. And the left-wing media would love to report on that violence rather than what was said at the convention.
Speaking Of Revolutionaries. . .
Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker is fanning the flames of racial tension, stoking hatred toward Donald Trump and instigating an insurrection against federal law enforcement.
The governor spoke at a black in Chicago this weekend. He told the audience that President Trump had ordered “masked troops” to arrest “innocent Black people and Brown people because of the color of their skin.” That’s a disgusting lie!
Of course, he is referring to our federal immigration police who are enforcing the law. The people they are arresting are not “innocent.” Pritzker smeared those federal officers as deranged killers, saying, “They’re still shooting people, innocent people, maybe more than anyone else.”
The only thing missing from Pritzker’s tirade was a call to take up arms against the government! But that’s what is going to happen if Democrats keep using this kind of obscene language and claiming it is normal discourse. It is not. It is revolutionary rhetoric. It is pre-civil war hyperbole.